Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 28, 2017, around 11:20 on February 28, 2017, the victim B (person with a first-class visual disability) borrowed from the second floor office of the building "D organization's Busan Metropolitan City Branch (hereinafter "D organization")" in the Dong-gu Busan Metropolitan City (hereinafter "D organization") to E (the second class visual disability) and became a vision for each other.

Defendant, having been located at that time, “EA” for the victim B

Does they grow up under the NIE test

“Along with the sound, the victim B used a breath with a breath, and used a breath of the victim B’s b.

2. The Defendant’s defamation at the above time, at the above time, and at the above place, there was a harmony between the victim B and the victim G (a female; hereinafter “G female”) who is an assistant to the victim B and the visually disabled person (hereinafter “victim B”) in the presence of not less than 11 persons, a D organization employee, and the victim G (hereinafter “G female”) who was an assistant to the victim B and visually disabled person.

“The honor of victims was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Part of the written statement made to B or G women, or of the written investigation of suspect with respect to E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Each fine for negligence selected;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Inasmuch as the false facts indicated in the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are highly inferred and low, it can be easily predicted that the victims’ result of defamation and the psychological impulse of the victims are very high. Nevertheless, the crime of this case, such as compensating for damages, etc. by the Defendant.