The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a managing director of the C-Organization.

On September 20, 2016, the Defendant: (a) called D’s former Vice-Chairperson E with a view to having a problem in the selection of E players at the meeting of D’s former Vice-Chairperson E with a view to having a problem in the selection of E players; (b) “The Board of Directors at the end of August 2016, the Defendant erred by the Defendant’s “I Eths for Persons with Disabilities.”

The phrase “assumed” was cited.

“.....”

However, the victim I, the vice president of the J organization, was wrong for the victim I to select the disabled shooting players.

In other words, H did not have any such remarks from the injured party.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing I's filing of complaint;

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 307 (2) of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1248, Apr. 1, 2006)