beta
Text
1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the plaintiffs falling under the following amount shall be revoked.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff A, B, and E are the owners of each of the instant vehicles listed below (hereinafter referred to as “instant 0 vehicles” in accordance with the pertinent sequence, and each of the instant vehicles is referred to as “each of the instant vehicles”). The owners of each of the instant vehicles listed in the following table (hereinafter referred to as “instant 0 accidents” and “each of the instant accidents”) are the persons who suffered damage caused by each of the instant vehicles due to the combination of each of the traffic accidents listed in the following table (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).
Plaintiff
C received the right to claim damages against the Defendant from the owner of the three vehicles of this case, and notified the Defendant of the assignment of claims by being delegated with the right to notify the assignment of claims.
C. On August 1, 2018, the lower part of the damaged vehicle on the expressway at around 16:50, August 11, 2018 at the time of the initial registration date of the vehicle involved in the incident of an owner of an automobile, at the time of the accident, around 23:38, 2018, the lower part of the damaged vehicle on the expressway at around 16:50, December 30, 2016, the 205, 430 won (hereinafter referred to as “the 23:38, Oct. 31, 2018”) of the 3rd vehicle E in the 3rd vehicle, EHdisyer, 184, 640, 640 won (hereinafter referred to as “the 19:5, Oct. 16, 2018”), while the 3rd vehicle caused by the bypassing vehicle at around 16:5, 2015.
B. The Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that has entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to each of the instant accidents.
C. The Defendant paid the following insurance money as compensation for damages arising from the decline in the exchange value of each of the instant vehicles due to each of the instant accidents:
① The instant owner A: 816,580 won. ② The owner B of the instant two vehicles: 1,362,00 won (based on recognition) did not dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 3, and Eul evidence 1 to 3, and Eul evidence 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings.
2. Determination on the cause of the claim
A. Each of the instant motor vehicles is destroyed by the external panel due to the instant accident.