beta
Text
Among the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs shall be revoked.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Plaintiff A, B, C, and D are the owners of each of the relevant vehicles listed in the column of the following (hereinafter referred to as “instant 0 vehicles” according to the pertinent sequences, and they are combined with “each of the instant vehicles,” according to the respective traffic accidents listed in the following table (hereinafter referred to as “instant 0 accidents,” and hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant accidents”), each of the instant vehicles is destroyed by the instant vehicle’s first registration date of the vehicle involved in the instant accident, the 1 AF UD A44, 406, 700 won on July 20, 2015, 200: 20:2:2:2:2:25:5% of the 5th left-hand-hand 3:4% of the value at the time of the initial registration date of the vehicle involved in the instant accident (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant accidents”), and 3:5% of the 19th 3rd 6:40% of the 2nd 19:306.
B. The Defendant is an insurer who concluded an insurance contract with respect to each of the instant accidents.
C. The Defendant paid the following insurance money as compensation for damages arising from the decline in the exchange value of each of the instant vehicles due to each of the instant accidents:
① The instant secondary motor vehicle owner B: 1,162,50 won (2) the details in C, D:751,200 won (based on recognition) of the instant three motor vehicle owner; 1,3,4, A’s evidence 1-3, 2-1, 3, 4, 3-1, 3, 3-4, 3-1, 3-4, 2-2, and 3-2, and 2-3 of the evidence; and the purport of the entire pleadings.
2. Determination
A. Due to the accident of each of the instant claims by the Plaintiffs, each of the instant automobiles has caused serious damage, such as destruction of a structural frame, and thus, it became impossible to repair it to restore to its original state even after completion of technical repair. Accordingly, the damage caused by the decline in the prices of the instant automobiles (so-called “satise damage”).
Therefore, the defendant, who is the insurer of the sea-going vehicle, is suffering from the decline damage.