1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs falling under the following order shall be revoked.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs are the owners of each passenger vehicle listed in the column of the following table (However, Plaintiff A acquired claims against H Co., Ltd. on the fall damage). They are those who suffered damage to their own motor vehicles due to each traffic accident listed in the column of the accident listed below.

There is no dispute between the parties in regard to the fault ratio of the vehicle at the time and place of the accident at the time of the first registration date of the car registration number of the automobile accident by the owner or the bond transferee.

Plaintiff A (hereinafter “Class I”) E40 Cbriet 2, 201.7. 84,860,000 won on July 2, 2018, and 100% of the front road in the J of Seopopo-si, Seopo-si on December 8, 2018, Plaintiff B (hereinafter “Second-Party”) Habri D (hereinafter “Second-Party”) Habri Habrid on July 24, 2018 before entering the road after the right-hand of the damaged vehicle and before entering the road, Plaintiff B (hereinafter “Second-Party”) Habri Habri Habri Habri Habri Doon on November 36, 2018.

1. On February 1, 11, 201, 200% 20% 20% 20% 100% 10% 5% 100% 5% 257m 20% 200% 20% 200% 20% 200% 20% 3, including the damaged vehicles, the 2nd 140 Salononon 5, Feb. 5, 2016, Palon 100 10% 10% 1,000 0,000 1,000 3,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 -

B. The Defendant, as an insurer who entered into an insurance contract for each of the above accidents, paid repair costs to the Plaintiffs, and paid KRW 1,440,134 to the Plaintiff B and KRW 846,000 to the Plaintiff C, respectively, based on the automobile price decline damages according to the Defendant’s automobile insurance clause.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 shall include the number, below.