logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.07.06 2017고단1843
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. 모욕 피고인은 2017. 3. 5. 05:50부터 06:00 경 사이 수원시 팔달구 B에 있는 ‘C 주점’ 앞에서 술에 취하여 주변인들에 시비를 걸고 욕을 하다가 112 신고를 받고 출동한 피해 자인 D 파출소 소속 순경 E에게 주변 행인들이 보고 있는 가운데 “ 씨 발 새끼야! 니 미 좃 꼴리는 대로 해 라, 좃 같은 새끼야!, 죽여 버린다!

In other words, “the victim openly insulting the victim”.

2. The Defendant who interfered with the performance of official duties was arrested in the act of insult at the time, time, and place specified in paragraph (1) and was next to the Defendant while getting in the seat after patrol after having been arrested as a flagrant offender.

D When taking a bath to F police officers who belong to the police box, the chest and head of the F was able to walk the bucks and walk the bucks, thereby hindering the police officers from performing their legitimate duties, such as criminal investigation, suppression, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the sentencing of each of the instant crimes on the grounds of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not good in light of the method and content of each of the instant crimes, the sentencing conditions in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, background of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be comprehensively taken into account in favor of the Defendant’s mistake, the Defendant’s primary offender, etc., and the sentencing conditions in the records shall be determined as per the disposition.

arrow