A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, at around 14:00 on January 6, 2017, insulting tobacco specialty stores, and “the Defendant was assaulted,” at the scopic tobacco specialty shop located in C, and the Defendant, upon receiving a report from the Defendant 112, was asked questions of the details of the report from E and scopic F, the police box affiliated with the wooden Police Station, and from E and scopic F, who are asked questions of the details of the report. “The Defendant sold bad tobacco in terms of hydrogen, demanded to confirm the certificate of business registration,” and smoking the disturbance, and the victim E from among the places where the Defendant and the customer are reported to the victim E.

“Abrutous” with a large sound, and the victim F is “Abrut, grh, Chewing,” and the business operator’s registration.

The victims were openly insulting by “a large sound,” and insulting the victims.

2. The Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties at the date, time, place, and place described in the above 1. Paragraph (1) and received a notice of payment of penalty for violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, which caused the disturbance to drinking from the above patrolmen E by avoiding the disturbance.

Accordingly, the Defendant: (a) Had the above patroler E with a large sound called “I see, dwarf,” and assaulted the left face of E one time by hand.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Each statement of F, G and H;

1. Application of the statutes on the place of service in a police box, and the photograph of the case;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is committed not only in the case where the defendant received a report from 112 and publicly insulting the victims in the presence of the police officer called out, but also in the process of receiving a notice of penalty payment as an act of disturbing drinking at that place.