logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.09.09 2015고단2569
상해등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 17:50 on February 15, 2015, the Defendant obstructed Defendant A’s business, within the F restaurant operated by the victim E with the wife population D, ordered him/her to enter the restaurant and take food into the restaurant, and ordered him/her to do so, on the ground that food was delayed, he/she was unable to avoid disturbance in the above restaurant for about 20 minutes, including where he/she was able to take a string and take a bath at the floor once every minute on the ground that he/she was late at the food and drink, and where he/she continued to have the sofet the sofetet the sofetet with the sofetet with the sofetetet with the food in the above restaurant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. Defendant B’s obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) the foregoing date, time, and place; (b) the circumstances leading up to the G District District of the Gangseo-dong Police Station G District, which received a report from 112, attempted to arrest A to commit an act of interference with his duties and to board A on the back of the patrol vehicle; and (c) obstructed A from getting off A from carrying the patrol vehicle in the direction of preventing him from carrying out the patrol vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender by a police officer.

3. Defendant A’s obstruction of performance of official duties, and the Defendant injured the victim H, who was called upon the 112 report, arrested the Defendant on the back of the driver’s seat of the patrol vehicle, and carried the Defendant on the back of the patrol vehicle’s driver’s seat, and the victim’s face was flicked into the flick part. The victim’s face was marked on the front part of the patrol vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers regarding the arrest of flagrant offenders, and at the same time, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as an injury to the victim, such as an injury to the integrity of the oral and oral surgery.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the Defendants (as of the second trial date, respectively);

1. The police statement of H;

1. Each statement of E and I;

1. A report on investigation (Submission of a medical certificate with the victim H);

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Defendant A of the relevant Article of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow