The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the attached list of crimes.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In the case of a game site including misunderstanding of facts, only 1 IDs per policyholder can be established. Since the title holder of the act of divulging confidential information in attached Table (2) of the Defendant’s crime list in the lower judgment is merely 15 persons, the number of crimes committed in violation of the Telecommunications Business Act due to the divulgence of other person’s confidential information concerning communications should be calculated 29 times without excluding the duplicate title holder. Other than 15 times.

B. In addition, the Defendant alleged that there was no actual crime with regard to the violation of the Telecommunications Business Act at the end of 198 and 199 of the crime table as indicated in the judgment below. However, according to the various evidence adopted at the trial court and examined, the Defendant committed the crime related to the above part, but the Defendant's allegation is without merit (the prosecutor added the above omitted part at the third trial date, added the above omitted part at the above 3rd trial date, and applied for amendments to the indictment with "H and public bid" at the same 1 to 30 to 198 and 199, and the judgment below did not result in a substantial change. Accordingly, the Defendant did not reverse the judgment below for this reason, attached 1 to 29 to 27 to 270, 14 to 47, 17 to 27, 19 to 27, 19 to 47, 19 to 27, 19 to 17, 27, 19 to 17, 1 to 27, 1 to 37, 1 to 2.

point. (hereinafter referred to as “Intermediate purchase”).