logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2016.07.18 2016고단456
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 2, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor by obstructing the performance of official duties at the Seoul Central District Court, and on July 26, 2014, the enforcement of the sentence was terminated at the Seoul Detention Center. On May 16, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor by obstructing the performance of official duties at the Chuncheon District Court's original Branch Branch, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 24, 2016.

1. On April 27, 2016, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s duty to handle the civil petition by force by force, such as pressing the victim’s desire to go from the waiting room, while drinking alcohol and drinking the safety appearance on the floor, at the entrance of the main common room located in 158 (School dong), which was located in the 158-ro, nuclear-ro, nuclear-ro, nuclear-ro, nuclear-ro, and the victim C, who caused the service, was urged to go from the waiting room.

2. On April 27, 2016, around 21:23, the Defendant: (a) at the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1); and (b) at the Hanju Police Station D District that received reports from 112, and sent the Defendant, the Defendant expressed that, in order to identify the personal information against the Defendant, E, a police officer affiliated with the Kuju Police Station D branch of the Kuju Police Station, who was called the Defendant, expressed that the Defendant “Woos in the People’s Democratic Republic of the People’s Democratic Republic” was at one time a part of the above E, and walked the above E’s right-hand bucks one time due to the outbreak of the above E, and served as a drinking to the above E.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the prevention and investigation of police officers' crimes, and legitimate execution of duties in 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. C’s statement;

1. Reporting on the arrest of a case;

1. Each photograph;

1. Previous records: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquire into criminal records, report on investigation (Attachment of criminal suspects and other relevant judgments, etc., attachment of the latest final judgments, and attachment of personal identification and confinement status;

1. Article 314 (1) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Articles 314 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act: Selection of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. Article 37 of the Criminal Code for the Treatment of Concurrent Crimes

arrow