Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant interfering with the performance of official duties on July 17, 2016, on the ground that the state of uniforms is inferior to the E (25 years old) who is a social service personnel belonging to the Military Manpower Administration, who has performed the duty of checking and managing screen fishing in front of the D Station D Station in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Sungnam-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, on the ground that the Defendant is punished and E, “if any objection is raised, the liquor tax is required to be raised at the customer support room.”

“I listen to the answer of “, I am fry, I am hicked the door of the D station office in the corridor of the W station, and am hicked the disturbance, I am hicker who completed the duty of inspection of the screen of the above E, and am hicker “Wer this hick,” and am hicked the E’s bat with his hand, and flapsed the chest of E, and flapsed the chest of E.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning passenger safety and order maintenance of social service personnel.

2. On July 17, 2016, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) around 00:40 on July 17, 2016, on the grounds that he obstructed the legitimate performance of duties by social service personnel, such as Paragraph (1) at G District District District of the Gyeonggi-gu Police Station G District, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul, and thus, was arrested and detained as flagrant offenders by H by a judicial police officer who belongs to the police station of the Gyeonggi-nam Police Station; (b) on the ground that he was arrested and detained at the place where he performed duties, the Defendant expressed a great voice for about 40 minutes to the police officers who were in charge of duties.

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, forced or scamed by very rough words and conducts at government offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and I;

1. Related photographs, CDs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the main sentence;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) of the pertinent Act on the facts constituting the crime, Article 3(3)1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and Article 3(3)1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment (the same type of crime has no record, and there is no record of criminal punishment since September 2009, and it is a shocking crime during the main sentence.