logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.02.06 2013가합5330
양수금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The defendant company is an automobile fluor.

Reasons

(b) approximately 80 million won;

(b) Re-determination of a park after re-examination of the cost with a request for realizing the unit price of the product after prior financial assistance, and recovery of subsidies after three months;

C. Before January 2010 to August 31, 2010: C, an employee of the Defendant Company, proposed on September 30, 2010 to be reflected in the supply unit price of the B 10 to August 31, 2010 to be stated as follows: B, an employee of the Defendant Company, obtained final approval on September 30, 201 to be delivered at the above unit price of B, as a result of the feasibility review on B, transferred from inside the processing unit price of Body, 25 to be delivered at the above unit price of the B, 250 won, 250 won, 10 to be applied retroactively from January 1, 2010 to 205 to 208.0 won, 208 to be paid at the above unit price of the B, 208 to be paid at the above unit price of the B, 300 to be paid at the above unit price of the B, 100 to be paid at the above unit price of the B from 205 months to 20.05 months.7.

As above, the amount increased by 250 won per unit price for each of the above items shall be as mentioned above in [Attachment 2] (4).

11 After analyzing the cost of B from January 201, the defendant company presented to B the opinion that it is reasonable to reduce the unit price of the product to 110 won retroactively in February 201, but B presented that it is reasonable to reduce the unit price of the product.

arrow