beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.
However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendants forged private documents in collusion with each other; Defendant B, upon Defendant A’s request on September 2013, entered “E”, “F”, “B” in the resident registration number column of the location of the lessor of the site for the apartment lease contract entered into at his office located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul at the end of September, 2013; “E”, “G” and “B” in the resident registration number column of the lessee’s column; “H certified brokerage office in the name column of the broker’s office; “I” in the representative column; “J” in the name column of the broker’s office; “B” and the deposit column “W 30,000,000,00” without permission of the above F and I.
Accordingly, on March 20, 2012, the Defendants forged one chapter of the apartment rental contract in the name of F and I, a private document on rights and obligations for the purpose of uttering in collusion.
2. On September 10, 2013, the Defendants conspired with each other to exercise the said investigation document, and the Defendant A delivered a copy of the pre-sale apartment contract as if it were the document duly formed to the victim who was unaware of the fact at the office of the victim L, Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office No. 812, Ktel 812, and the pre-sale apartment contract was delivered by Defendant B.
Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to use the forged private document.
3. Fraud;
A. The Defendants conspired with each other to commit the crime on September 10, 2013, and Defendant A made an investment of KRW 50,000 to the victim’s office at around September 10, 2013, and to the victim’s office at around September 10, 2013. The Defendant would pay 3% of the profits every month.
“B” and “B” are the natives of the Gu, which the Gu has 2.3 million won of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the lease, and thus, B will be the guarantor.
In making a false statement, Defendant B presented one chapter of the above apartment lease contract, which Defendant B forged, as if it were valid.
However, even if Defendant A received an investment of KRW 50 million, he was unable to meet the interest rate of KRW 3% every month.