The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable in its summary of the grounds for appeal.

2. There is no significant change in circumstances that may be considered in sentencing favorable to the defendant after the judgment of the court below.

In light of the records and arguments of the instant case and the reasons for sentencing of the lower judgment, such as the fact that the Defendant had been punished over three times in 2005, 2014, and 2015 due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime, it cannot be deemed that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable even if considering the circumstances required by the Defendant.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the conclusion is groundless.