The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable in its summary of the grounds for appeal.

2. There is no significant change in circumstances that may be considered in sentencing favorable to the defendant after the judgment of the court below.

In light of the following, even if the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment on the grounds of the violation of the Road Traffic Act in 2003, 2005, 2007, 2010, and 2017, the Defendant committed the instant crime during the suspended sentence period, even though he was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) and a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) in 2018, the Defendant committed the instant crime during the suspended sentence period, and the reasons for the sentencing of the lower judgment, the lower court’s sentence cannot be deemed unfair even if considering the required circumstances of the Defendant.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the conclusion is groundless.