The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (five million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. There is no significant change in circumstances that may be considered in sentencing favorable to the defendant after the judgment of the court below.

The crime of obstruction of performance of official duties requires strict punishment as a crime detrimental to the function of the State by nullifying a legitimate exercise of public authority, and when examining the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case and the reasons for sentencing of the lower judgment, even if considering the circumstances required by the Defendant, it cannot be deemed that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the conclusion is groundless.