logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.01 2016가단5200494
기타(금전)
Text

1. The plaintiffs' primary claims and conjunctive claims are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs asked C of travel goods through the Kakao Stockholm case, etc.

C had the Plaintiffs make a promise on behalf of the travel goods requested by the Plaintiffs, and had the Defendant Company (hereinafter the Defendant Company) deposit the travel price into the SC Bank account under the name of the Defendant Company A (hereinafter the Defendant Company).

B. Accordingly, the Plaintiffs from June 15, 2016 to the same year.

7. By no later than 18.18., each corresponding amount listed in Schedule B of Claim Amount deposited into the above bank account in the name of the Defendant Company.

C. C requested the representative of the Defendant Company B to issue a third party’s airline ticket with the money deposited by the Plaintiffs, and the Defendant Company issued the airline ticket as requested by C. D.

At the time, C was liable for personal debt equivalent to 230,000,000 won borrowed from its family members and branch members, and for loans of financial institutions equivalent to 20,000,000,000 won. Since around 2015, C did not have any intent or ability to purchase on behalf of the Plaintiffs, by receiving information on the credit card of the customer from the customer under the name of the customer, such as the purchase price for airline tickets, or by letting the customer transfer the money to the account of the other travel agency, or by having the customer pay the purchase price for airline tickets.

E. On March 29, 2017, C was sentenced to a 4-year conviction of imprisonment with prison labor at the Gangnam Branch of the Chuncheon District Court (2016 Godan1008, etc.) due to the following criminal facts, etc.

“C” is as follows:

Even if there was no intention or ability to purchase airline tickets on behalf of the victims, such as Plaintiff D, due to the situation in which the airline tickets are to be returned, the victims, including Plaintiff D, including the victim.

arrow