logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2020.02.27 2017가단493
공사대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 78,386,042 for the Plaintiff and its related KRW 6% per annum from November 1, 2015 to February 27, 2020, and the following.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On February 2, 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a construction contract for the construction of the Defendant’s six factories and one office building (hereinafter “instant building”) (hereinafter “instant construction”) on the ground, including Pakistan, in which around 480 million won for the construction cost and May 2015 for the completion of the construction completion plan to the Plaintiff by setting the construction cost as KRW 48 million for the construction cost and the completion of the construction completion plan (hereinafter “instant construction contract”).

(hereinafter “instant construction contract”). Details of the construction contract are as follows.

Contract for Construction Work Contract

2. On-site address: D in cases of strike.

5. Outline 1) The Plaintiff’s construction of the above parcel number is equivalent to a written estimate submitted to the Defendant. 3) Other than a written estimate, the Plaintiff will continue to perform the construction of the above parcel number under subsequent consultation.

4 A contract shall be concluded in accordance with a written estimate.

Terms and Conditions of Special Agreement

2. Matters other than estimate separately;

4. If any additional check occurs, the additional check shall be executed after the approval of the project owner, and shall be settled after the completion.

5. The terms and conditions of the construction shall be the basis for completion and all responsibilities except the interior of a dormitory on completion shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

[Written Estimated Contract Form] separate project content (A) separate (C) the indoor interior interior interior interior of a dormitory, SSD, the creation of a legal side of a lot of land shall be conducted with the approval of the landowner.

B. The Plaintiff, while preparing and delivering a written estimate (Evidence A No. 1-2) to the Defendant during the process of performing the instant construction project, found that the additional payment of KRW 1.1 million was made, and the Defendant’s representative stated “after delay settlement”.

C. After completing the instant construction project on May 2015, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to pay a total of KRW 54,754,200, when preparing and sending a statement of settlement (Evidence A A 1-1) to the Defendant.

The Plaintiff performed a construction project that falls under the items recognized in the attached Table (hereinafter referred to as “instant additional construction project”), and the construction project is a construction project that does not appear in the written estimate of contract for the instant construction project.

[Ground of Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 15 (including paper numbers), and

arrow