The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On September 25, 2015, the Defendant rejected the demand for withdrawal due to the reason that LH construction and housing problems have not been resolved even though the Defendant received a request for a change from the security guards, at the 207 bicycle storage facility, 207 bicycle clock clock clock clock clock clock clock clock clock clock clock clock clock clock clock clock clock clock clock clock c

2. The judgment C, in its statement on December 24, 2015, had “the Defendant lived in a bicycle depository from October 2015 to October 2015.”

The court stated to the effect that other security guards, including the swres, other security guards and residents demanded to report and the police officers demanded to leave, but did not comply with the request. However, the court did not refuse to see the Defendant as being on September 2015 in the court.

There is no word to change the right to lease, and there is no word to change.

The written statement is merely a content written by residents or the heads of the Bans. Of the written statement on December 24, 2015, C’s statement that C requested C to leave the Defendant cannot be believed, and the written statement on September 25, 2015 was requested C to leave the Defendant as stated in the facts charged.

The recognition is insufficient, and there is no other evidence to prove it.

3. According to the conclusion, the facts charged in the instant case constitute a case where there is no proof of criminal facts, and thus, a judgment of innocence is rendered after Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.