logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.10.11 2018고정1968
퇴거불응등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who has no certain occupation and has a good appraisal about D's representative of the C performance Institute in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

1. Refusal to withdraw;

A. At around 20:00 on January 19, 2018, the Defendant: (a) was unable to resist the said D at the Yeongi Private Teaching Institutes; and (b) was unable to resist the said D by taking a large sound; (c) even upon receiving a request from the employees E who worked in the said Private Teaching Institutes, the Defendant refused to leave the said office, etc. for about 40 minutes; and (d) refused to leave the said office, etc. without justifiable grounds.

B. Around January 22, 2018, the Defendant was unable to resist the victim’s request for withdrawal without justifiable grounds, even upon receiving the said D’s request for withdrawal from the said D, and the Defendant rejected the victim’s request for withdrawal from the said office, etc. for about 30 minutes.

(c)

On January 23, 2018, the Defendant was unable to resist the said D at the Yeongi Private Teaching Institute’s Office of Korea (hereinafter “C”), and the Defendant was able to resist the said D with a large voice that she had worked in the said Institute of Korea. However, upon receiving a request from F, the Defendant refused to leave the said Institute of Korea for about 30 minutes, and did not leave the office of the said Institute of Korea, etc. for about 30 minutes, thereby refusing to comply with the request for withdrawal of the victim without justifiable grounds.

(d)

On January 26, 2018, the Defendant was unable to resist the said D at the Yeongi Private Teaching Institute’s Office of Korea (hereinafter “C”), and the Defendant was able to resist the said D with a large amount of sound that she had worked in the said Institute. However, upon receiving a request from F, the Defendant refused to withdraw from the said Institute’s office of office, etc. for about 30 minutes, and refused to comply with the request for withdrawal of the victim without justifiable grounds.

E. On January 27, 2018, the Defendant met the said D at the Hai Private Teaching Institutes around 19:35, and was unable to cause a disturbance by taking the said D’s heavy sounds. The Defendant was an employee who was working in the said Kai Private Teaching Institutes.

arrow