A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) and the Road Traffic Act (Aggravated Punishment, etc.) are those engaged in driving B of other vehicles;

On November 26, 2014, the Defendant driving the above vehicle on the 21:25th day of November 26, 2014, and driving the 198 Home Packer road to the art of Nam-gu, Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon, with approximately 30 km of Si-si from the new world department store to the view room of Incheon.

In this case, a driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to live well in the front and rear left and drive the steering gear accurately and prevent the accident by safely operating the steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to stop in the front of the vehicle at the front of the Defendant’s vehicle, and caused the back portion of the vehicle at the front of the Defendant’s vehicle at the low-speed car driven by the victim C (W, 45 years old), which was driven by the Defendant, to shock the back portion of the vehicle at the front of the Defendant’s vehicle, and caused the victim D (W, 44 years old) who was parked before the vehicle at the front of the vehicle at the front of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant by occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim C, such as salt, tensions, etc., in which treatment for about two weeks is required, and the victim E (the age of 14) who was aboard the damaged vehicle, suffered injury such as satise, tensions, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks, and suffered injury such as satise, tensions, etc. in the bones of the bones requiring treatment for about two weeks, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim D, even if the satise vehicles are damaged to the extent that the satise vehicles are damaged to the extent that the satise of repair costs are destroyed to the extent that the satise vehicles are damaged to the extent that the satise vehicles are destroyed to the extent that the satise of repair costs.

2. The Defendant who violated the Road Traffic Act is negligent in neglecting his duty of care at the time, time, and place set forth in paragraph (1).