logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.05.08 2014고단3184
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 21, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 2.5 million won due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the Goyang Branch of the Jung-gu District Court on November 21, 2007, and the same court was sentenced to a fine of 2.5 million won due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the same court.

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (U.S.) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) are those who are engaged in driving service of Class B and Class III cargo vehicles;

On November 24, 2013, at around 20:00, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol of 0.225% of blood alcohol concentration, and led the roads of 24 lanes in front of the sunlight village 24 lanes in the direction of Seoul from the direction of Seoul.

At the time, vehicles are stopped at night and in the front door, so in such a case, the driver has a duty of care to prevent traffic accidents in advance by accurately operating all the steering gear while looking at the right and the right on the front door at all times and maintaining the safety distance with the vehicle in front.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in neglecting it, and the part of the part of the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the Defendant’s vehicle driving by the victim C (the age of 52) who is waiting for a signal in front of the Defendant’s vehicle was driven in front of the Defendant’s vehicle, and due to the shock, the above damaged vehicle was pushed in front of the Defendant’s vehicle, and the victim E (the age of 35) was driving.

Ultimately, in the above occupational negligence, the victim C was injured by scam, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment; the victim G (the 49-year-old) was injured by brain scams, etc. in need of medical treatment for about one week; and the victim H (the 50-year-old age-old) was injured by scams, tensions, etc. in need of medical treatment for about one week; at the same time, the victim C was injured by scams, tensions, etc.; and at the same time, the victim H

arrow