1. The Central Labor Relations Commission’s dismissal on April 12, 2017 between the Plaintiff and the Intervenor’s Intervenor, which was unfair in turn.

On February 21, 2008, C University was authorized by the Minister of Education and Human Resources Development as a lifelong educational establishment that is recognized as having the academic achievement and degree equivalent to a junior college pursuant to Article 31 of the Lifelong Education Act. The Plaintiff is a juristic person operating C University (hereinafter “instant school”).

On March 1, 2011, the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor”) was appointed as an assistant professor specializing in music studies and music studies of the instant school for a fixed period of two years, and was reappointed on March 1, 2013 for two years.

On March 1, 2015, an intervenor was reappointed for a fixed term of two years (from March 1, 2015 to February 28, 2017). However, on August 31, 2016, the Plaintiff requested the Teachers’ Disciplinary Committee to make a resolution on the Intervenor’s disciplinary action on the following grounds. The president of the instant school notified the Intervenor on September 1, 2016 on the ground that the resolution on disciplinary action was requested.

In 2015, it is false that the results of the evaluation of the class of music, medical majors, and the results of the evaluation of the class of the first semester have been prepared by the private owner of the relevant department(D professor). In order to find the relevant student, the act of impairing the teacher's dignity under Article 61 (1) 1 and 3 of the Private School Act by disregarding the principle of non-disclosure as a result of the evaluation of the class, disclosing the relevant details to the time of the class, and spreading the relevant false details to the school instructors and employees in writing.

b. To provide money and valuables, etc. to one student in the musical community, the principal filed a false civil petition with an external institution, such as the Ministry of Education, etc. several times, and violates Article 61(1)1 and 3 of the Private School Act by providing money and valuables, etc. to one student in the musical community, and using the name of the student, and also violates Article 61(1)1 and 3 of the Private School Act. In addition, the instant civil petition is continuously filed at least seven times in total with the internal and external institution, such as the instant school, E University, and the National Newspapers, and