(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.07.27 2017구합62198

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.07.27 2017구합62198

취소결정취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

Reasons

1. Details of the decision;

A. The Plaintiff is a school foundation operating C University, etc., and the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) was appointed on March 1, 201 as the head of C University and the assistant professor on March 1, 201.

① The most of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the other part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the other part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the other part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the other part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the other part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the other part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the other part of the part of the part of the part of the part of the part.

Plaintiff

On November 24, 2016, the board of directors decided on the proposal for disciplinary action against the intervenor. On November 25, 2016, the Plaintiff requested the Cuniversity Teachers’ Disciplinary Committee to make a disciplinary action against the intervenor. On December 9, 2016, the teachers’ disciplinary committee decided to dismiss the intervenor. Accordingly, on December 14, 2016, the Plaintiff issued a dismissal disposition (hereinafter “instant dismissal disposition”) on the ground that the intervenor violated Article 61(1)1 through 3 of the Private School Act as follows.

C. On December 23, 2016, the Intervenor filed a petition review seeking the revocation of the instant dismissal disposition with the Defendant. On February 22, 2017, the Defendant rendered a decision to revoke the instant dismissal disposition on the grounds that each of the instant disciplinary grounds is not recognized (hereinafter “instant decision”).

[Ground of recognition] There is no dispute.

참조조문

-사립학교법 제61조 제1항 제1호

유사 판례

-서울행정법원 2018.05.31 2017구합68844

-서울행정법원 2017.12.22 2017구합63306

-서울행정법원 2017.04.14 2016구합65152

-서울행정법원 2018.11.02 2017구합87067

-서울행정법원 2017.08.18 2016구합84283