1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants and the selective claims added by this court are all dismissed.

2...

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is as follows, and the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case citing this case citing this case citing the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance excluding the following determination as to the claims added by the plaintiff in this court citing this part as it is stated in the reasoning

[Supplementary portions] The third party 11 and 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance in the part "The lease term is set from March 30, 2016 to March 29, 2018 (24 months)" shall be determined as "10,000,000 won out of the lease deposit at the time of the contract, the remainder of KRW 300,000,000 shall be paid on the day before the commencement of business, respectively, and the lease contract term shall be set as 24 months from the remainder date."

Part 16,00,000 won for the lease deposit of the same day, monthly rent of KRW 16,000 for the lease deposit of the same day, and KRW 100,000 for the lease deposit of the same day, and KRW 100,000 for the lease deposit of the same day, the remainder of KRW 300,000,000 for the lease deposit shall be paid on March 30, 2016, respectively, and the lease contract period shall be from March 30, 2016 to March 29, 208.

The third part of the judgment of the court of first instance from 18th to 20th day of March 11, 2016, the Defendants sent KRW 30,000,000 to the Defendants, and KRW 20,000 to E, respectively, and the Plaintiff sent KRW 188,00,000 to the Defendants on April 8, 2016, and paid KRW 112,00,000 to the Defendants as a check.”

Each testimony of witness E and F in the fourth sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be made by taking the witness E and F as “each of the testimony of the first instance E and F (except for the portion not believed in the following)”.

The fourth part of the judgment of the first instance shall be deemed to read “a cancellation may be made,” or “a cancellation may be made on the grounds of deception by Defendants or F, a real estate brokerage assistant,” and the fourth part of the judgment of the first instance shall be deemed to read “afusing, or having known or could have known F’s deception.” The fourth part of the judgment of the first instance shall be deemed to read “afusing, or having known or could have known F’s deception.” The fourth part of the judgment shall be deemed to read “afusing, or having cancelled,” or “af