logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.08.12 2019나81643
사해행위취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the cases where the written indictment is written as follows, and thus, it is acceptable as it is in accordance with the main sentence

2. Parts to be dried;

A. The 3rd, 9th, 4th, 8th, and 16th of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be applied to “this Court” as “Sawon District Court’s Sungnam Branch support.”

B. Part 6 of the first instance judgment of the court of first instance, “H (Trade Name after Change: I)” was added to “H (Trade Name after Change: I)”.

C. Part 4 of the first instance judgment of the first instance court "this Court" is incorporated into "Uiwon District Court". D.

The 7th of the first instance judgment "other selective claims or preliminary claims by the plaintiff" in the 11th of the first instance judgment shall be construed as "the remainder of the plaintiff's primary claims (the allegation that this case's sales reservation is invalid under the Trust Act) and preliminary claims (the revocation of fraudulent act and the claim for restitution)".

3. The judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow