Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

(a) No person who violates the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (Violation of Information and Communications Network Utilization, etc.) shall be knowingly provided with any divulged personal information for profit

On May 24, 2011, at least 12:50, the Defendant requested the client to inquire about information on subscribers to the unspecified mobile phone number, received a request from the client, and requested B to inquire about information on subscribers to the above unspecified mobile phone number, and in return, paid KRW 2.50,00 to the passbook E in the name of the head of the NAC, the NAC account in the name of the Defendant, and received the information on subscribers to the unspecified mobile phone number from B, and delivered it to the client.

The Defendant continued to pay KRW 3,480,00 on 24 occasions between May 24, 201 and October 27, 2011, as shown in the attached Table A, and received 24 items of information from the subscriber to the phone number of the irregular cell phone and delivered it to the clients.

Accordingly, the Defendant knowingly received personal information for profit or for an illegal purpose.

(b) No one but a credit information company, etc. in violation of the Use and Protection of Credit Information Act shall find out the whereabouts and contact details of a specific person or investigate private life, other than commercial transaction relationships, including financial transactions;

On May 31, 2011, the Defendant provided the client with the content that “A person who resides in any other place than the client’s known address and works as a restaurant employee,” upon request from F to “A person having the same personal information so that he/she may confirm the same,” which is paid KRW 2 million to C, the agricultural bank account in the name of the Defendant, the head of the Tong, under the name of the Defendant, provided the client with the content that “A person who resides in the place other than the client’s known address, and the parent is working as a restaurant employee instead of operating the restaurant.”

Defendant continued to do so.