logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.08.25 2017누32939
유족급여 및 장의비 부지급 처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following matters among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of

The 3rd and 12th and 7th and 12th and 7th are frequently referred to as "small".

From 3 parallels at the bottom of 6th parallels “in light of experience rules” to 9th parallels as follows:

In light of the following: (a) on January 29, 2015, the Deceased was traveling a business trip from 06:01 to 17:43, the Deceased’s computer files were modified on a day; (b) on February 5, 2015, there was a record of modification of the Deceased’s computer files; and (c) on February 11:41, 2015, there was a record of modification of the Deceased’s computer files made it possible for the Deceased to use the computers used by the Deceased from 06:0 to 17:43; and (d) on the other hand, it is difficult to conclude that the Deceased worked for the period of modification of the Deceased’s computer files from 10:5 hours to 10:5 hours to 20 hours to 10:5 hours to 20 hours to 3:5 hours to 3:0 hours to 30 hours to 3:0 hours to 30 hours to 30,000 before the Deceased’s final computer files were closed or closed from 1.

arrow