1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, citing the instant case, is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following parts, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(2) In addition, the court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion, even if the Plaintiff’s assertion was examined as to the evidence submitted in the first instance court and the first instance court, does not significantly differ from the contents of the Plaintiff’s assertion in the first instance court, and even if all of the evidence submitted in the first instance court and the first instance court were examined, the judgment of the court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion is justifiable). [The part that was modified] If the court of first instance 2nd and 14th of the judgment of the first instance, the “

The judgment of the court of first instance is deemed to be “a dismissal of the application for payment of compensation, etc. by judging the 4th judgment.”

In the judgment of the first instance court, the first instance court's decision on the payment of the above compensation "1)" is deemed to be "1) the payment decision of the compensation deliberation committee for the above compensation."

On March 5, 1951, the third 12th 12th 3th 195 of the judgment of the court of first instance, “the deceased was arrested at the silence of Gangwon-do and incorporated into C military units, etc.” shall be deemed to be “from March 5, 1951, such as the deceased was arrested on March 5, 1951.”

On March 1, 201, the first instance court's judgment's 3rd 18th e.g., "3th e.g."

The plaintiff added 20 of the judgment of the court of first instance to the "3th 20 of July 24, 2003" after the "the plaintiff". The plaintiff "from around February 5, 2005 to October 1954 after he was kidnapped at the silent of Gangwon-do around February 5, 1951" was "the plaintiff was born from March 3, 1951 to around February 5, 2005 after the enactment and enforcement of the Special Child Compensation Act" and the above compensation deliberation committee received an application for the above compensation from the deceased on March 3, 1952 to investigate the work and activities of the deceased and confirmed that "the deceased's entry date of the deceased was not around March 3, 1951, but around March 3, 1952, the plaintiff confirmed that the deceased's entry date of the deceased was "the person who performed special military missions" (No. 4. 5th 9th Ga, etc.).