1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the modification of part of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in paragraph (2). Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the

2. Part 3 of the amended part No. 14 of the 14th part is as follows.

In addition to the above statements, the deceased stated that “the deceased was engaged in work in the mountain and digging division in M which was located in the Do fraternity from 1962 to 1967.” However, the deceased stated that “the deceased was engaged in work in the mountain and digging division in M which was located in the Do fraternity,” all of the “this court” in the 6th 4th , 7th 5, 8th 9, 9th 20th 20 of “the court” in addition to the above statements.

Type 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, and 12 of Part 8 of the 8th page "Evidences 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 12, and 13 of Part A".

The statement of the deceased in Part 4 of the 10th page is "the statement of the deceased E" as "each statement of the deceased E and the deceased's friendship."

The following shall be added subsequent to "no evidence of the sixth conduct":

As stated above, it is difficult to believe one of the above statements is not in accord with the deceased’s work place between around 1962 and around 1967, and each of the above statements is in a friendly relationship with the deceased, and it is difficult to recognize the above facts asserted by the Plaintiff solely based on such statements without any objective material to support them.

【】

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.