Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 00:30 on February 16, 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed assault against the victim at the right side of the victim’s left arms in front of the U.S. elementary school located in the U.S. northwest-dong in the U.S. in the U.S., Gunsan-si; (b) took a dispute with the victim; and (c) took a bath for the victim to “the victim who is not a driver of the width vehicle immediately ; and (d) stated that “the victim would not take a bath and promptly change the rent”; and (c) assaulted the victim at one time to take the right side of the victim’s left arms.”

2. The Defendant destroyed property by taking one card size of 250,000 won, which was installed in a taxi operated by the victim at the above date, time, and place, as head, destroyed by a breakdown.

3. On February 16, 2014, the Defendant: (a) voluntarily her police box of the Gunsan Police Station in Sinsan-si; (b) voluntarily her police box in the Gunsan-si, Sinsan-si; and (c) voluntarily her speeched him to the slope G (the age 40) affiliated with the said police box (the age 40), who was preparing a written consent of voluntary her operation; (d) her talked with the police officer who heard the horses to see why she would dump his bath, and she dump the horses to see she would she, and she she dump to she, she she dump the flaf, and she dumped the flaf’s flaf with the her hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on criminal investigation and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Each statement of H, I, and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as photographs, etc. of damaged parts of vehicles and written estimates;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 260(1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines (the fact that there is no previous criminal record for the same offense, the damage incurred by the damage has been repaid, and the fact that there has been an agreement with the police officer

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;