1. The defendant in the judgment of the first instance exceeds the amount ordered to be paid below against the plaintiff A.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: " without a driver's license" in Section 3, Section 1, and Section 2 of Section 3, Section 1, and Section 2 of the first instance court's decision (as for the plaintiff, around January 27, 2013, the plaintiff has been discovered by driving without a driver's license) and Section 7, " without a driver's license" in Section 8, "the calculation table of the amount of damages" shall be replaced by the attached table below, and the part of the first instance court's decision is as stated in the reasoning of the first instance court's decision, except for the case where part of the first instance court's decision is dismissed as follows. Thus, it shall be cited as is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. The income and operation period of the part after completion of repair work : The city daily wage of an ordinary worker and the number of working days on October 18, 2018, which appears to have been completed for 21 months after the Plaintiff became an adult, are presumed to have reached the age of 60 until he/she reaches the age of 60, on October 18, 2018: Provided, That since the Plaintiff is presumed to have completed the life expectancy before he/she reaches the age of 60, 1/3 of the living cost is presumed to have been deducted thereafter. See 5, 8, and 11.

(b) Future medical treatment costs: The following:

(1) Except for the medical expenses paid by the Defendant on behalf of the Defendant, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the Defendant spent the future medical expenses with the urology and the urology prior to the date of closing argument in the trial, and thus, it shall be deemed that the disbursement was made at intervals of one year from June 22, 2016, which is the day following the date of closing argument in the trial, and the annual heading number shall be limited to 20: 20 per annum. 20 per annum 6 1 to 10 : table below.

(A) As there is no evidence to acknowledge the fact that Plaintiff A received antiscopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics

Assistants: The following table:

(Accounting convenience is deemed to have been first disbursed on June 22, 2016, which is next to the date of closing argument in the trial.) 1.