The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (based on factual errors or misapprehension of legal principles) stated that the defendant appeared as a witness of the case No. 207Kadan2096 decided Apr. 4, 2008 and raised perjury. On Dec. 24, 2008, the defendant appeared again as a witness of the case No. 2007 Goyang-gu District Court 2096 decided Dec. 24, 2008 and appeared again as a witness of the case No. 2008 Goyang-gu 2008 decided Apr. 4, 2008 and the above case No. 2008 Goyang-gu 602 decided Apr. 209 was combined with the above court No. 2007Gadan2096 decided Apr. 4, 2008, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles as to perjury or by misapprehending the legal principles as to perjury, which affected the conclusion of the witness examination of the defendant.

Judgment

The summary of this part of the facts charged was that the Defendant arranged a sales contract to sell the E land to F on March 23, 2004 and completed the registration of ownership transfer in the name of F on May 24, 2004. However, around July 2005, the Defendant requested F to cancel the contract and compensate for damages from F, which became aware of the existence of military miters, etc. on the above land, and accordingly, the Defendant and D, etc. issued KRW 80 million in total twice as agreed money from March 21, 2006 to May 15, 2006.

After that, D, around August 20, 2007, received intimidation from F to report to the tax office in relation to the delivery of the agreed amount as above, and filed a complaint against the suspicion of committing F to join the Republic of Korea (No. 2007 type No. 29395 of the Government's High Prosecutors' Office, No. 2007 type No. 29395 of the Government's High Prosecutors' Office, No. 2007 type No. 2096 of the Government's High Court, No. 2007 type No. 2096 of the Government's High Court, the Defendant and Defendant's wife, also on December 207