(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.04.30 2018가단9824

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.04.30 2018가단9824

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's respective claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The Defendants asserted that they filed a complaint against the Plaintiff on February 9, 2017 with the Goyang Branch Office of the Government's Goyang Branch Office of the District Prosecutors' Office for the charges of violating the Real Estate Brokerage Act. However, the said complaint by the Defendants is groundless. Therefore, the Defendants are obliged to pay consolation money of five million won and damages for delay, respectively, for mental damage suffered by the Plaintiff due to an act of false accusation.

2. Therefore, according to the health stand and evidence No. 1 as to whether the Defendants were without the Plaintiff, the Defendants, who obtained the right to purchase the housing site after residing in the O housing site development project zone, shall be deemed to have filed a criminal complaint on the charge of tax evasion and violation of the Real Estate Brokerage Act by trading the said Defendant’s right to purchase the housing site at the intermittent value without qualification, on February 2017.

However, according to the evidence evidence evidence Nos. 2 and 3 and 5, the Defendants’ withdrawal of the complaint against the Plaintiff among the 13 employees, upon the recommendation of the police officer in charge after the complaint was filed, and the prosecutor of the High Prosecutors’ Office at the Goyang branch office at the Donyang branch office at the Don branch office at the Don branch office at August 23, 2017, on the ground that the Defendants could not hear the statements about the facts of the complaint. Since then, the Plaintiff submitted a written complaint against the Defendants to the Seoul Western District Public Prosecutor’s Office at the charge of accusation on October 30, 2017, the Plaintiff revoked the complaint, on which October 30, 2017; P and Q were indicted and brought a criminal trial to the Seoul Western District Public Prosecutor at the Don branch branch branch office at the Don branch office at the Don branch office at the Don branch office at the Don branch office at the Don branch office at the Don branch office.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified.

참조조문

-부동산중개업법

유사 판례

-수원지방법원안산지원 2017.06.20 2015가단28852

-대구지방법원 영덕지원 2018.07.17 2017가단884

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2012.10.19 2011고정1772

-의정부지방법원 고양지원 2021.02.17 2020가단89946

-서울남부지방법원 2016.03.31 2015나26141