logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.05.16 2019고단1381
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A entered the Republic of Korea as a visa exemption (B-1) and the period of stay expires on January 28, 2018, and is not a person handling narcotics, etc.

At around 17:00 on March 3, 2019, the Defendant purchased 325,000 won in cash to the person who was infinite name (hereinafter “D”) in the vicinity of Heung-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, and purchased 5 terms. On March 4, 2019, the Defendant purchased 1,000,000 won in cash to the “D”, the person who was infinite name, at the same place, at around 08:00 on March 4, 2019.

Accordingly, the defendant purchased 25 weeks.

B. At around 13:00 on February 24, 2019, the Defendant administered bab in the toilets of the lusular marine type, which are located in the 2 cycle of Cheongju-si, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongju-si, in a manner that makes it possible for the Defendant to open 3 bab ababba, and open baba in a manner that makes it difficult for the Defendant to open bababa, which occurs by heating the bottom of 3 bababa. 2) around 13:00 on February 26, 2019, the Defendant administered 2 bababa in the toilets of the said Mababa.

3) At around 13:00 on February 28, 2019, the Defendant administered 2 in the toilet room in the instant marina shop. (4) On March 3, 2019, the Defendant administered 4 in the above manner. Around 18:00 on March 3, 2019, the Defendant administered 4 in the toilet room in the instant marina shop.

C. Notwithstanding the fact that the Defendant violated the Immigration Control Act did not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities and the period of sojourn expired on January 28, 2018, the Defendant had been employed as an employee and engaged in job-seeking activities until February 24, 2019, as an employee, in the Taesung-si’s exclusive golf club F, which is an Taesung-si E around February 2, 2019.

2. Defendant B employed Defendant B as an employee at the same time and place as set forth in the above paragraph 1(c), and there was no status of stay to engage in job-seeking activities, and the period of stay has already expired.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Entry or departure status and accusation of immigration offenders;

1. The written seal of the prosecutor of the defense counsel;

arrow