A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On September 8, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for habitual gambling at the Seoul Central District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 20, 2016.

[Criminal Facts]

1. The Defendant and C are legal couple who married around August 4, 2004 on the charge of forging private documents and exercising the above investigation document, and are currently in a divorce lawsuit.

On June 28, 2016, the Defendant stated that, at a law firm E office in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, a notary public, on five floors of D Building, the amount borrowed from F, as “C”, “C”, “five years”, “C”, and “C” in the proxy form that was located for the purpose of the Defendant’s use in preparing a fair deed that the amount borrowed from F is joint and several sureties, and the Defendant was in possession of the same name.

After affixing C’s seal, the above notary public, who is aware of the forgery, submitted the forged power of representation to the law firm employee as if it was duly formed.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged a power of attorney in the name of C, a private document on rights and obligations without authority, and exercised it.

2. The Defendant, at the same time, at the same place as Paragraph 1, and at the same time, at the same time and place as that of Paragraph 1, the fact that the Defendant was not delegated by C with the authority to conclude a joint and several liability contract, the said notary public, using forged power of attorney-at-law in charge of notarial services, has the attorney-at-law in charge of notarial services prepare a certificate of fairness in monetary consumption and lending contract stating that “A shall provide joint and several surety for KRW 200 million borrowed from F.” At that time, the said notary public had the said E-office keep a certificate of fairness stating the fact of

In this respect, the defendant made a false report to the public official, and made him enter false facts in the certificate of monetary consumption loan contract which is the original of the fair deed, and exercised it.