Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From December 13, 1993 to March 19, 2012, the Defendants were in a legal relationship with the Defendants, and Defendant A was demanded from the end of October 2009 to compensate the F operator G to compensate for damages because it was discovered that the Defendants stolen cash stored on the above F Office’s books around April 5, 2010, which had been employed as an employee in the F Office’s work from the end of king to the end of October 2009.

1. Defendant A, who was requested by the F operator to prepare a document of the process of lending and borrowing a monetary consumption contract with the purport that he/she would establish a joint guarantor and receive a stolen public fund amounting to KRW 50 million, as a joint guarantor, Defendant A would jointly prepare the above fair deed.

A. On April 30, 2010, the Defendant forged the power of attorney in B and held B’s name “A” and “B” in the name column of the delegating column without obtaining B’s consent to prepare a fair certificate of monetary consumption lending and lending contract at the F Office located in Dong-si, Gyeonggi-do, for the foregoing purpose. On April 30, 2010, the Defendant stated “B” as “B” in the letter of delegation form; “O,00,000 won” in the column of the lending date; “E, June 15, 2010; “B” in the debtor column; and “B” in the debtor column and the joint guarantor column.

B The letter of seal impression affixed in B and then delivered it to G as if the power of attorney was duly prepared.

The Defendant, for the purpose of exercising without authority, forged and exercised a letter of delegation, which is a private document, on the rights and obligations or proof of facts in B’s name.

B. On July 6, 2010, the Defendant, in whose case the letter of delegation in the name of B forged in the same manner as the above “1.A” was delivered to G and caused the said G to do so, and the notary public, who had H and 328 of the Republic of Korea, had the attorney-at-law in charge of notarial services of the law firm I, J, on April 30, 2010, 30,000 won, 00 won, 15 June 2010, 2000, 30%, interest rate, and delay interest, respectively.