Defendant

B shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

Defendant

B If the above fine is not paid, 100.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B around 20:00 on September 7, 2016, the victim A (49 Does) and the motor vehicle trading problems were caused by the victim A (49 Does, south Does) and the motor vehicle trading problems, while drinking with the victim, the victim's face was faced with the victim's entrance, the victim's loss and drinking, and the victim's face was raised by several times with the victim's shoulder.

As a result, the defendant put the victim with salt, tensions, etc. of 14 days in need of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of a witness A and G;

1. A written diagnosis of injury (H emotional distress and issued on September 10, 2016);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to replys as a result of inquiries into the fact that H regular surgery is conducted;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of punishment: Selection of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant A) of the Provisional Payment Order;

1. On September 7, 2016, Defendant A: (a) around 20:00, at the end of the time of the Victim B (56 years) located in the F in Gyeongsung City; (b) on the automobile trading problem, Defendant A: (c) rancing the Victim’s neck with the victim by pushing the Victim’s seat; (d) flading the Victim’s neck with his hand; (c) flading the Victim’s left eye by drinking the Victim’s eye; and (d) once again, flading the Victim’s left eye by drinking the Victim’s eye.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as cutting the frame of internal walls and internal walls that require treatment for about 62 days.

2. The Defendant asserts that, while under the influence of alcohol, he did not assault B’s face face value while going beyond his will, he was under influence of alcohol.

As evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case, Defendant B’s statement is the only evidence, the credibility of the statement is examined, the witness G, and I’s respective legal statements, the transcript of the conversation (including a recording file) of the Defendants immediately after the instant case, the contents of the Defendants’ respective statements in the court and investigation agency, and the Han Forest University Saem Hospital.