Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. On December 27, 2014, the summary of the facts charged in the instant case: (a) around the elevator of 22:30, Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Apartment 203, the Defendant assaulted the victim by hand, in his hand, who was a proxy driver of the Defendant’s vehicle, on the ground that the victim D, who was a proxy driver of the Defendant’s vehicle on the same day, changed the victim’s vicarious driving expenses. (b) On the other hand, the Defendant dumped the victim’s erobbbbage, and walked
2. Determination
(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;
(b) Crimes of non-compliance with will: Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act.
(c) Expression of intention not to punish: On November 13, 2015, the victim’s expression of intention not to punish him/her after the prosecution of this case was instituted.
(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.