logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.23 2014나35197
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants ordering payment in excess of the following amount shall be revoked, and that part shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the basic facts are added to the "in addition to the "in addition to the "in addition to the "C" No. 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance, within the limit of KRW 100 million per capita/1 accident", it is identical to the "in addition to the "in addition to the "in addition to the "in addition to the "C" of the judgment of the court of first instance, within the limit of KRW

2. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on the occurrence of liability for damages and the limitation thereof is the same as that set forth in paragraph 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. Scope of damages.

(a) On-going income: The amount of damage to the establishment of one-time, equivalent to the total appraised value of the financial capacity lost by the Plaintiff due to the instant accident shall be calculated at the present price at the time of the instant accident according to the Hofmanial Calculation Act, which deducts the intermediary interest at the rate of 5/12 percent per month based on the facts recognized and the content of assessment as follows:

(C) The period of operation and the number of operating days of adult male as at the time of the instant accident: The rate of loss of working ability per month (by April 14, 204), which is close to the real name, shall be 24% (by day after April 14, 204), and the rate of loss of working ability per month: 24% (by day after April 14, 204), and 24% (by day after January 1963, 1963) of the date of the instant accident: The previous position different from the previous position of the U.S. as at the time of the instant accident, and by removing the rate of loss of working ability per day from the academic chart of the U.S. as at the time of the instant accident, and by uniformly evaluating the number of loss of working ability per month: The Plaintiff’s real name and the rate of loss of working ability per month.

arrow