beta
Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid additionally below.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment, except that the court’s content as to this part of the liability for damages is seeing “after and later” as “after and later” under the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. As such, the court shall accept it as it is in accordance
(A) In light of the circumstances of the accident in this case, it is reasonable for the first instance court to limit the defendant's responsibility to 60%. Accordingly, all of the plaintiffs and the defendant's arguments are rejected). 2. The defendant's assertion that the parties to the scope of the liability for damages do not separately state the scope of the liability for damages shall be rejected, and it shall be calculated at present in accordance with the door-to-door calculation method that deducts interim interest at the rate of 5/12 per month as a simple interest, and the calculation is less than monthly and less than KRW
In December 2, 2024, the Plaintiff may obtain at least the wage of an urban ordinary person by December 2, 2024, when the Plaintiff reaches the age of 60,00, which is the end of the income operating period AH 2, personal information No. 1)
Since the daily wage of an urban ordinary person is applied (22th day of the same month), 68,965 won during the period of hospitalization and 75,608 won after discharge shall be applied.
3) From September 24, 2010 to September 23, 2010, which was hospitalized from February 23, 2010, the date of the accident (100% until September 23, 2010), 55.8% of the mental health specialists (5.8% of the maximum working age), who were hospitalized from September 24, 2010 to December 3, 2024, and 35% of the disability rate following the Mabrid Labor Loss Evaluation Table H-B-2 applied, and 32% of the total disability rate (or 35% of the 35% disability rate) and the Mabrid Labor Loss Evaluation Table received from Mabrid Labor Loss Evaluation Table (35% of the total disability rate) and 35% of the total disability rate (or 5.85% of the total 30-205.36% of the 5.25% of the 5.295% of the diagnosis and evaluation).