A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 12, 2016, between 20:10 and 20:40, the Defendant, who interfered with business, expressed “E” in Changwon-si member D, Changwon-si, and expressed that the victim F, an employee, had the victim F, who was an employee, expressed his/her desire to interfere with his/her duties, but was not a big disease.

In addition, the Defendant did not calculate the string, and tried to go her match without calculating it, and the victim her wring the Defendant, and her hrings the victim her bath at several times with the victim’s “hing, hinginginging off,” and her strings at the entrance of the string, and her hinging down with the view that he she was hinginginging up at the entrance of the string.

As above, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s business operation by force.

2. Definating;

A. On September 12, 2016, at around 20:30 on September 12, 2016, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victims, respectively, on the ground that: (a) the Defendant reported the 112-report that the Defendant was frighting, and the Defendant was trying to verify the Defendant’s personal information, etc., by the victim H, a police officer belonging to the Mapo-dong Police Station G police station, which was dispatched to the site by the Defendant; and (b) the victims, who had a large number of players, etc., of whom there were several employees and the victims.

B. At around 20:50 on the same day, the Defendant, at the Masan-dong Police Station Gtation in the Changwon-gu, Changwon-si, the Defendant, arrested a flagrant offender and was transferred to the police box by interference with or insulting the above duties, and took the victim L of the K team leader’s guard, the team leader’s leader’s leader, and the victim M of the team chief who works at the scene, while there were traffic petitioners and employees, etc., who were working there. In other words, the Defendant abused the victims of the victims of the Masan-dong Police Station, respectively, by openly booming the victims of the Masan-gu, Changwon-gu, Changwon-si, Masan-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1.F.