logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.19 2017나56195
양수금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. Even if the quoted trial of the first instance court is closely examined by the parties’ allegations and the evidence submitted in the first instance court, it does not seem that it erred by the finding of facts and judgment of the first instance court.

Therefore, the reason for the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Therefore, it is accepted by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In the part of the trial of the first instance, the “gal construction work” in Part 6 of the judgment of the second instance shall be replaced by “construction work”.

On the third side of the judgment of the court of first instance, the "money" in the 5th part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be charged with "rest damages".

In Part 4 of the first instance court's decision, "No. 9, No. 2, and No. 3" in Part 2 of the second instance court's decision shall be construed as "each entry of No. 9, the results of the first instance court's financial transaction information inquiry into national banks, the results of the first instance court's first instance court's first instance court's first instance court's first instance court's second

On the fourth 6-7th 7th 7th of the judgment of the court of first instance, the defendant was paid to the account of the representative director, and he was paid to D with the account of the representative director, and the defendant was written with "."

3. In conclusion, the conclusion of the first instance judgment is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow