logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.12.15 2016누61015
징계처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The grounds alleged in the court of first instance by the Plaintiff for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are not different from the contents alleged by the Plaintiff in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance dismissing the Plaintiff’s claim even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance is re-

Therefore, the reasoning for the court's explanation on the instant case is as follows: (a) under Part 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the second sentence " August 9, 2015" was dismissed as " August 19, 2015"; (b) No. 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance was charged as the crime of offering of bribe; and (c) on January 15, 2016, the court of first instance rendered judgment guilty on the ground that "D provided a bribe to public officials belonging to the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, including the plaintiff, in relation to the duties of guiding and supervising Korean advance payment, such as the instant disciplinary cause of this case, to the public officials belonging to the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries including the plaintiff in relation to the duties of the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries; (d) No. 2014Da365); and (e) the appellate court dismissed the appeal of D's conviction on September 8, 2016 (Supplementary High Court No. 2016No484, Feb. 2, 2016).

2. Thus, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow