The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

1. On October 28, 2014, around 00:44, the Defendant: (a) had F, the Defendant’s wife, transfer KRW 300,000 to the bank account designated by G, in the vicinity of the “E” telephone; (b) around 01:00 on the same day, G transferred approximately 1 g of psychotropic drugs, which were psychotropic drugs stored in the air conditioners, to the bank account designated by G; and (c) held approximately 01:00 on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant purchased and sold Metepha ambamins.

2. It is true that the Defendant found G in around October 28, 2014 at the “E” telephone in order to visit G, but it is not a penphone to find that G intended to arrange for a gambling site’s total board, and it does not change that G used to transfer KRW 300,000 to G is not a way that G used to lend money and paid it as the purchase price of phiphone.

A witness G asserts that the criminal defendant's finding "E" has a philophone, and 300,000 won has been paid as the purchase price of philophones.

However, the witness G makes a statement to the effect that the defendant was suspected of not cooperating with the investigation of a vessel because he/she made H to inform the investigation agency of his/her own when the defendant sought phiphonephones. Under such circumstances, the witness G's statement that the defendant responded to the request of the defendant to seek phiphones is not in compliance with the rule of experience, but is likely to put the defendant who made the investigation agency inform him/her of his/her phiphones into the difficult situation.

Moreover, in the instant case, if the Defendant had approximately one g of philophones as stated in the facts charged, the Defendant administered them by himself.

such disposition has been made to another person.