The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal consistently stated in the investigative agency to the effect that “The defendant was asked by the defendant to request writingphones from the defendant, and the defendant was allowed to enter the telephones near the O station, and then put about about oneg of philophones into a coffee mixing, put them into the cooling machine, and put them into the cooling machine, and then inform the defendant of the fact that he was found to have concealed philophones within the 300,000 won, after confirming that the defendant remitted 300,000 won,” and that G and the telephone contents of the defendant also conform to the above statement and therefore, they were reliable in G’s above statement, and thus, the judgment of the court below acquitted the defendant guilty of the charge of this case.

2. Determination

A. The judgment of the court below held that the witness G made a statement to the purport that the defendant was suspected of not cooperating with the investigation of a vessel because the defendant asked H to inform the investigation agency of the defendant at the time when the defendant asked for h's phiphone. Under such circumstances, the witness G's statement that the defendant asked for h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's h's.