1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 26, 1984, the Plaintiff was employed as a public official of Grade II in career service and was promoted to Grade II in the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries as a veterinarian on March 17, 2014, and served as C, etc. by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (hereinafter “Food and Drug Administration”).

B. The defendant has committed the following misconduct to the plaintiff, and the plaintiff's misconduct violates Articles 56 (Duty of Fidelity), 58 (Prohibition of Deserting from Office), 61 (Duty of Integrity), and 63 (Duty of Integrity) of the State Public Officials Act, and falls under the grounds for disciplinary action under Article 78 (1) of the same Act. The plaintiff's misconduct constitutes grounds for disciplinary action under Article 78 (1) of the same Act; 6,73,600 won which the plaintiff received unfairly as the name of compulsory treatment and 785,700 won which the plaintiff received illegally through a request

1.(c)

- 1 Paragraph 1 and

1. D.

(3) On December 10, 2015, the amount of KRW 7,559,300 in total was subject to the imposition of a disciplinary surcharge (hereinafter “instant disposition”) and the amount of a disciplinary surcharge (7,559,300 won: 7,559,300) imposed on the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff is subject to the imposition of a disciplinary surcharge (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

("each of the above dispositions" ("each of the dispositions of this case") - - Future - [Grounds for Disciplinary Action]

1. On March 24, 2013 to March 19, 2015, the Plaintiff related to the external lecture received a total of KRW 69,711,90 on the pretext of lectures, medical treatment, etc.

Where a public official receives an external lecture and conducts an external lecture, etc., he/she shall comply with the former Code of Conduct for Public Officials of the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (amended by Ordinance of the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, April 18, 2016; hereinafter referred to as "Code of Conduct").

(2) In accordance with Article 15(1), the Plaintiff shall report to the Code of Conduct Official pursuant to Article 15(1). However, on April 8, 2013 to March 17, 2015, the Plaintiff did not report the outside lecture over 111 times in total, and did not report the outside lecture even after receiving KRW 49,259,550 in total. 22 times among the 42 times reported the outside lecture, etc., 11,806,080 in total due to lectures, etc.