beta
Text
1. On April 15, 2016, the part of the disposition imposing disciplinary surcharge imposed by the Defendant on the Plaintiff on the Plaintiff exceeds KRW 400,000.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff was appointed as a policeman on April 1, 200, and served as B Provincial Police Agency criminal and metropolitan investigation units from February 4, 2015 to December 30, 2015, and was promoted on March 31, 2015.
B. On April 15, 2016, after deliberation and resolution by the General Disciplinary Committee of the Local Police Agency, the Defendant issued a disciplinary measure against the Plaintiff on dismissal and one-time disciplinary measure (650,000 won) under Article 56 (Duty of Fidelity), Article 57 (Duty of Fidelity), Article 61 (Duty of Integrity), Article 63 (Duty of Integrity), Article 5-2 (2), and Article 14 (Restriction on Conduct of Public Officials of the National Police Agency) of the State Public Officials Act.
Examining the grounds for disciplinary action against the Plaintiff, police officers shall observe all relevant Acts and subordinate statutes and faithfully perform their duties, and, in particular, regardless of whether they either directly or indirectly give or receive cases, donations, or entertainment in connection with their duties, they shall accept entertainment equivalent to KRW 1950,00 from the Korea Regional Investigation Agency (2.4-2, 2015 to December 30, 2015) to a metropolitan investigation group (D Entertainment) (15:0 on May 15, 2015, at C’s 601 room, E (45: South) from the F (F) of the person with whom he/she was involved in the investigation to pay for the organized violence G at the time of the investigation into the instant case, and (2) from the person with whom he/she was subject to the duty to maintain the dignity of the said D's employee with sexual traffic during the investigation into the said D's sexual traffic, he/she shall be exempt from the duty to maintain the dignity of the person with whom he/she was not charged.
C. The Plaintiff filed a petition review.
The Ministry of Personnel Management around May 2016, which is dissatisfied with the dispositions stated in paragraph 1.