logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.07.12 2017고단420
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 29, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and the Road Traffic Act (dless driving) on the road in front of a mutually influent restaurant located in the right fluence-dong, the Defendant driven a e-high-speed car with alcohol level of 0.085% while under the influence of alcohol at about 100 meters from the 100-meter section to the roads in front of a instant dental school located in the right fluent city.

2. On January 29, 2017, when the Defendant: (a) committed a crackdown on driving of drinking on the road in front of the aforementioned D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D dental, the Defendant informed the relevant police officer of his/her personal information about his/her pro-born H, and had the said police officer enter H’s personal information in the portable device (PDA) (PDA) to notify him/her of the results of the crackdown on driving of drinking; and (b) as a result of the control on driving of the mobile device on the screen, the Defendant signed H’s signature in the column for confirmation of the driver on the screen as a result of the control on driving of drinking of the mobile device; and (c) let the said police officer know of the fact transmit

Accordingly, the defendant forged his signature and used a forged signature.

3. During the process of preparing a statement report on the driver’s circumstances at the same time and place as the above 2.3 billion won, the Defendant entered the above police officer’s name and resident registration number to H and signed the driver’s column “H” and sent the above police officer’s signature next to it.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged the driver's report column of the state driver's circumstantial statement in H's name, which is a private document on proof of facts, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. The driver's license ledger (A);

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on driving under drinking;

1. Entry of the statement on the circumstances of the driver who is to be placed and present;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing electronic signature evidence photographs;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 3 and Article 44 of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts

arrow