2017Nu62541 Revocation of revocation of permission for extension of sojourn period, etc.

1. A;

2. B

Since the Plaintiffs are minors, the legal representative C and the parent of parental authority D

Head of Seoul Immigration Office

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2017Gudan3215 decided July 11, 2017

September 19, 2017

October 17, 2017

1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed. 2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The defendant's decision to deny the extension of the period of stay to the plaintiffs on January 9, 2017 is revoked.

The reasoning for the court's explanation on the instant case is as follows: (a) the second and fifth instances of the judgment of the first instance are "Seoul Administrative Court"; (b) the fourth and tenth instances " September 3, 2016" are " September 13, 2016"; and (c) the first and seventh instances "the interval" are the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except that the second and fifth instances of the judgment are "the interval of September 13, 2016"; and (d) so, they are cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act; and Article 420 of the

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

The presiding judge, assistant judge and assistant judge

Judge Park Jong-soo

Judges Lee Hyun-woo